Tag Archive for: Visa Delays

EMPLOYMENT PERMITS ACT 2024 SIGNED INTO LAW

UPDATE ON PROCESSING OF VISA APPLICATIONS IN THE EMBASSY OF IRELAND, NEW DELHI, INDIA

The Embassy of Ireland, New Delhi, has announced a number of updates on the processing of visa applications and appeals in a notice dated 18th July 2024.

Firstly, the notice provides that those in the following visa categories will now have their application transferred to the Dublin visa office for processing:

  • Family member of EU/EEA/Swiss cit. (de facto partner);
  • Family member of EU/EEA/Swiss cit. (other);
  • Family member of EU/EEA/Swiss cit. (spouse);
  • Join Family (Irish nat.)(de facto partner);
  • Join Family (de facto partner CSEP/HA) ;
  • Join Family (UK nat.);
  • Minister of Religion; and
  • Volunteer

This means that, for these categories, the Dublin visa office processing times now apply.

The notice provides an update on median processing times for applications processed in the Embassy of Ireland, New Delhi. Notably, the processing time for Join family visas is now listed as 3 calendar months for a first instance decision, and 12 calendar months for an appeal decision. The notice states that the Embassy currently has a backlog of Join family appeals, specifically those involving Category B sponsors in Ireland who failed to meet the criteria set out in the Policy Document on Non-EEA Family Reunification.

The notice additionally states that applications which have not been processed within the median processing times stated on the website are likely delayed for various reasons, such as a delay in biometric information, ineligibility or that the application is awaiting verification.

With regard to Join family visas specifically, delays likely mean that the sponsor has not met the criteria set out in the Policy Document on Non-EEA Family Reunification. The notice states that, in such cases, applications will be reviewed under the exceptional criteria which can take up to a year to be fully assessed.

The full notice can be found here:

Visa Information, times and decisions | Embassy of Ireland, India | Ireland.ie | Ireland – this is Ireland

This blog article has been prepared on the basis of current immigration law and policy, which is subject to change. Please keep an eye on our blog and Facebook page where articles relating to updates and changes in immigration law and policy are regularly posted.

UPDATE ON VISA DELAYS – ATIF AND MAHMOOD CASE

UPDATE – A few months ago, we published a blog regarding the considerable delays in the processing of EUTR visas for the family members of EU citizens. In Atif and Mahmood, several applicants challenged the legality of such delays.

In Atif and Mahmood, the High Court in Ireland ruled in favour of the applicants indicating that any delay over six months in processing visa applications was too long. However, the Minister appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals in Ireland. In order to make a decision in this matter, the Court of Appeals referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for guidance.

Specifically, the Court of Appeals sought a preliminary ruling on how to interpret Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004. This article addresses the free movement rights of EU citizens and their families and requires the Member State “to issue a visa as quickly as possible to the spouse and family members of a Union citizen exercising free movement rights.”

The Court of Appeals set forth these questions to the ECJ for preliminary ruling:

  1. Does a Member State breach the requirement of Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC when the delays in processing an application for EUTR visas for the family members of EU citizens exceed 12 months?
  2. Does a Member State breach the requirement of Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC when delays in processing are due to ensuring that the application is not fraudulent or an abuse of rights, for instance, a marriage of convenience?
  3. Does a Member State breach the requirement of Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC when delays in processing are due to background and security checks on applicants coming from third world countries for security purposes?
  4. Does a Member State breach the requirement of Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC when delays in processing are due to a “a sudden and unanticipated surge in such applications coming from certain third countries which are thought to present real security concerns”?

To the above questions, the ECJ has made a decision regarding this matter.

“Since, however, all of the visa applications at issue in the main proceedings were the subject of negative decisions, which were contested by means of court actions which were not upheld, and since the referring court has noted that the Court’s answer can no longer benefit the applicants in the main proceedings, as is clear from paragraphs 18 and 20 of the present order, the dispute in the main proceedings has become devoid of purpose and, consequently, an answer to the questions referred appears to be no longer necessary.”

Since all of the applications in question had already been determined, the ECJ deferred from making a decision in this matter. Essentially, the ECJ determined that issuing a decision in this case would no longer be beneficial to the applicants and therefore there is no point in pursuing the matter further. Thus, the issue of how to interpret Article 5(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC in regard to visa delays remains unresolved.

Read more about visa delays in our full blog here.

Read the full decision in this matter  here.